smart card protection profile Smart Card ICs, Hitachi Europe Ltd., Infineon Technologies AG, and Philips Semiconductors 3 This Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile has been built with the [4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation; Version 2.1 (ISO 15408) which comprises [5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1:
One card or device per person. A couple of considerations. While Oyster works out your daily cap, contactless also works out your weekly cap. You'd be charged the lower of the .
0 · Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile
1 · SOG
2 · Protection Profiles : CC Portal
The Dallas Cowboys squeaked out a win over the Detroit Lions, 24 to 20, in the 2014 NFC Wild Card game on January 4, 2015.View scores and results from week 1 of the 2015 NFL Postseason
Smart Card ICs, Hitachi Europe Ltd., Infineon Technologies AG, and Philips Semiconductors 3 This Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile has been built with the [4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation; Version 2.1 (ISO 15408) .This protection profile was developed to identify and set forth a comprehensive .Supporting multiple functions, Smart Card mainly consists with the hardware .11 This Protection Profile defines security functional requirements and assurance .
JICSAP ver2.0 Protection Profile part2, Protection Profile for Smart Cards with the Application . Smart Card ICs, Hitachi Europe Ltd., Infineon Technologies AG, and Philips Semiconductors 3 This Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile has been built with the [4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation; Version 2.1 (ISO 15408) which comprises [5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1:JICSAP ver2.0 Protection Profile part2, Protection Profile for Smart Cards with the Application Program Loading Function (version 1.7e), Version 1.7e 1.7e EAL4+ICs, Smart Cards and Smart Card-Related Devices and Systems – 80 Protection Profiles.
This protection profile was developed to identify and set forth a comprehensive list of smart card security requirements based on the ISO Standard 15408, the “Common Criteria” (available at http://www.csrc.nist.gov/cc).Supporting multiple functions, Smart Card mainly consists with the hardware element of IC chip, card operating system for resource and data management, interface between the loaded application program and card operating system, and application program to .The Open Platform Protection Profile (OP3) recasts the Open Platform (OP) security requirements into the language of the Common Criteria (CC) to facilitate the formal evaluation of OP smart cards. In doing so, OP3 stretches the CC to new limits. There are four areas of innovation: The Open Platform Protection Profile (OP3) recasts the Open Platform (OP) security requirements into the language of the Common Criteria (CC) to facilitate the formal evaluation of OP smart cards.
Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile
Visa has tested hundreds of smart cards since 1995. Most fail functional testing the first time around. About a third failed security testing after they passed functional. Situation is improving considerably.
Protection Profiles in the Context of German Electronic ID Cards. Protection profiles based on the Common Criteria present threats to specific security objectives in a structured manner and define the minimum requirements of corresponding security measures.11 This Protection Profile defines security functional requirements and assurance requirements for Smart Card operating system, and interface between loaded application program and operating system except for IC chip which is hardware part of Smart Card
Smart Card ICs, Hitachi Europe Ltd., Infineon Technologies AG, and Philips Semiconductors 3 This Smartcard IC Platform Protection Profile has been built with the [4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation; Version 2.1 (ISO 15408) which comprises [5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1:JICSAP ver2.0 Protection Profile part2, Protection Profile for Smart Cards with the Application Program Loading Function (version 1.7e), Version 1.7e 1.7e EAL4+ICs, Smart Cards and Smart Card-Related Devices and Systems – 80 Protection Profiles.This protection profile was developed to identify and set forth a comprehensive list of smart card security requirements based on the ISO Standard 15408, the “Common Criteria” (available at http://www.csrc.nist.gov/cc).
SOG
Supporting multiple functions, Smart Card mainly consists with the hardware element of IC chip, card operating system for resource and data management, interface between the loaded application program and card operating system, and application program to .
The Open Platform Protection Profile (OP3) recasts the Open Platform (OP) security requirements into the language of the Common Criteria (CC) to facilitate the formal evaluation of OP smart cards. In doing so, OP3 stretches the CC to new limits. There are four areas of innovation: The Open Platform Protection Profile (OP3) recasts the Open Platform (OP) security requirements into the language of the Common Criteria (CC) to facilitate the formal evaluation of OP smart cards.
hajj smart card
Visa has tested hundreds of smart cards since 1995. Most fail functional testing the first time around. About a third failed security testing after they passed functional. Situation is improving considerably.Protection Profiles in the Context of German Electronic ID Cards. Protection profiles based on the Common Criteria present threats to specific security objectives in a structured manner and define the minimum requirements of corresponding security measures.
Protection Profiles : CC Portal
S.A.S. WAKDEV CEO: Julien Veuillet Answering machine: +33.652283944 E .
smart card protection profile|SOG